Article View: comp.protocols.iso
Article #1157MAP .vs. TOP
From: Steve Lawyer
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 1991 15:31
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 1991 15:31
12 lines
715 bytes
715 bytes
Fred Halsall in "Data Communications, Computer Networks, and OSI" comments that the overhead of the full 7 layer model is significant for MAP, but, makes no further comparison in the subsequent discussion of TOP. Could someone offer me some insight, as to why the overhead would be significant or an issue for MAP, but not for TOP? thanks, steve ----- lawyer@ida.org or ..!omni!lawyer
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Mar5.153116.1939@IDA.ORG>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!IDA.ORG!lawyerShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!IDA.ORG!lawyer From: lawyer@IDA.ORG (Steve Lawyer) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso Subject: MAP .vs. TOP Message-ID: <1991Mar5.153116.1939@IDA.ORG> Date: 5 Mar 91 15:31:16 GMT Organization: IDA, Alexandria, VA Lines: 12