Re: TCP/IP has SLIP, OSI has ???

Article View: comp.protocols.iso

Article #1403

Back to comp.protocols.iso Previous Next

#1403

From: ROGER JAMES
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1993 08:33

15 lines
1117 bytes

In article <1993Jan6.202505.26759@twg.com> david@twg.com (David Herron) writes:
>Conversion-With-Loss: Prohibited
>
>The fact that the APS Alliance (or so I understand) voted down a PPP
>based proposal at their meeting is alarming.  It would be synchronistically
>groovy if the ISO crowd would recognize the wide availablility of PPP
>and `allow' for TP0..4 to traverse PPP-OSI paths.  Since PPP supports
>

The APS alliance "voted down" OSI-PPP because we thought it would happen
anyway. If I remember the conference call correctly it will be mentioned
as one of the recommended profiles. The "voting down" was to do with
the technical group doing work on it, we will be working on other profiles.
-- 
roger@bj.co.uk

Technical Details

Message-ID: <159@bjcong.bj.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!warwick!uknet!pyrltd!bjcong!roger

References: <1993Jan6.202505.26759@twg.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!warwick!uknet!pyrltd!bjcong!roger
From: roger@bjcong.bj.co.uk (ROGER JAMES)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso
Subject: Re: TCP/IP has SLIP, OSI has ???
Message-ID: <159@bjcong.bj.co.uk>
Date: 7 Jan 93 08:33:03 GMT
References: <1993Jan6.202505.26759@twg.com>
Reply-To: roger@bjcong.UUCP (ROGER JAMES)
Organization: Boldon James Limited (UK)
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message