Article View: comp.protocols.iso
Article #1426Re: CMIS get-response question - please help !
From: Randy Parker
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 15:14
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 15:14
15 lines
1475 bytes
1475 bytes
|> The issue comes up when you have errors related to some attributes |> of an object. If the answer to the question above is 'yes', one could send |> back a 'GET-LIST-ERROR' as a CMIS-LINKED-REPLY. If the answer is 'no', one |> has to send back a CMIS-SERVICE-ERROR if the reply involves one objext, but |> a CMIS-LINKED-REPLY if the reply involves more than one object. This issue came up during interoperability testing. I do not believe there is anything in the standard preventing you from sending the linked error rsp. |> I like to have just one type of reply in this case and let that be |> a CMIS-LINKED-REPLY whether the reply involves one object or more. This is how the agent did it. They used the process fail error instead of the get list error. I do not know if this was officially clarified (from ISO). I can just say that my experience is that your interpretation is ok.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan27.151453.4446@porthos.cc.bellcore.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.univie.ac.at!scsing.switch.ch!univ-lyon1.fr!ghost.dsi.unimi.it!rpi!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbnewse!cbnewsd!att-out!walter!porthos!base.bellcore.com!rhpReferences:
<86010007@nsmdserv.CND.HP.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.univie.ac.at!scsing.switch.ch!univ-lyon1.fr!ghost.dsi.unimi.it!rpi!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbnewse!cbnewsd!att-out!walter!porthos!base.bellcore.com!rhp From: rhp@base.bellcore.com (Randy Parker) Subject: Re: CMIS get-response question - please help ! Organization: Bellcore, Livingston, NJ Date: Wed, 27 Jan 93 15:14:53 GMT Message-ID: <1993Jan27.151453.4446@porthos.cc.bellcore.com> References: <86010007@nsmdserv.CND.HP.COM> Sender: netnews@porthos.cc.bellcore.com (USENET System Software) Lines: 15