Article View: comp.protocols.iso
Article #1540Addressing in ISO
From: Bob Tausworthe
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 1988 08:11
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 1988 08:11
22 lines
1276 bytes
1276 bytes
I am writing this note in an effort to obtain some information on the
addressing strategies employed by different organizations in their ISO
networking products. The areas I'm concerned with are:
- CONS vs CLNP. How are you making the decision?
- ES-IS protocol. Are you implementing it on ES systems?
- first hop decisions for ESs. are you statically configuring this
information?
- CLNP over X.25. What addressing methods do you support.
- TPvsCLNP SAP identifier in Call User Data
- Subaddressing
- Extended address facility
I would appreciate any information people have on this subject, as
well as any new information people may have about NBS, and/or GOSIP
conformance. I am also interested in how some companies may be addressing
(no pun intended) these problems.
thanx in advance
tozz@hpinddu.hp.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5560009@hpindda.HP.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cwjcc!mailrus!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!hplabs!hpda!hpcuhb!hpindda!tozzShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cwjcc!mailrus!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!hplabs!hpda!hpcuhb!hpindda!tozz From: tozz@hpindda.HP.COM (Bob Tausworthe) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso Subject: Addressing in ISO Message-ID: <5560009@hpindda.HP.COM> Date: 6 Dec 88 08:11:52 GMT Organization: HP Information Networks, Cupertino, CA Lines: 22