Article View: comp.protocols.iso
Article #1547Re: ROSE Services
From: Kevin Montgomery
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 1989 02:20
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 1989 02:20
15 lines
1126 bytes
1126 bytes
/ hpindda:comp.protocols.iso / joey@geaclib.UUCP (Joey De Wiele) / 11:59 am Jan 10, 1989 / > In examining the ROSE services closely, in conjunction with the > Directory services, it seems to me that aspects of the Directory Service > would be better transferred to the ROSE service element. Some examples > are: yeah, but I think the idea of the current division was to allow ROSE to be a generic Remote Operations ASE, usable in many different SPPs (not just Directory). As such, an effort to keep ROSE as simple and stupid as possible was probably made at the time... (anyone know how the other ROSE-users would like a RO-ABANDON service? MHS-folks?) kevguy ps: no one said ROSE was perfect, but at least it's somewhat stable! ;-)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5560011@hpindda.HP.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!hplabs!hpda!hpcuhb!hpindda!kmontReferences:
<3547@geaclib.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!hplabs!hpda!hpcuhb!hpindda!kmont From: kmont@hpindda.HP.COM (Kevin Montgomery) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso Subject: Re: ROSE Services Message-ID: <5560011@hpindda.HP.COM> Date: 17 Jan 89 02:20:36 GMT References: <3547@geaclib.UUCP> Organization: HP Information Networks, Cupertino, CA Lines: 15