Article View: comp.protocols.iso
Article #1709Re: kerberos and the ISO protocol standards
From: Marshall Rose
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1989 19:26
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1989 19:26
18 lines
1262 bytes
1262 bytes
Jim - there are three cases of standardization work: 1. Where there is exactly one de facto standard for a particular kind of technology. In this case, standardization is fairly straight-forward. 2. Where there is more than one way of doing it in use, e.g., CO- and CL- mode networking. In this case, the committees often take the bells and whistles of each, e.g., the OSI network layer. 3. There there is no de facto standard, e.g., the application layer framework. In this case, the committees often engage in what might be mistermed "research", e.g., the OSI appliation layer structure. Your analysis is correct in case 1. In cases 2 and 3, we usually get truly horrible stuff (e.g., the OSI network layer and the OSI appliation layer structure) for different reasons, which should both be obvious. /mtr
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<20750.630012382@cheetah.nyser.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!decwrl!ucbvax!CHEETAH.NYSER.NET!mroseReferences:
<16365.629989412@tis.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!decwrl!ucbvax!CHEETAH.NYSER.NET!mrose From: mrose@CHEETAH.NYSER.NET (Marshall Rose) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso Subject: Re: kerberos and the ISO protocol standards Message-ID: <20750.630012382@cheetah.nyser.net> Date: 18 Dec 89 19:26:22 GMT References: <16365.629989412@tis.com> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: iso@nic.ddn.mil Organization: The Internet Lines: 18