🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.protocols.iso
Article #1709

Re: kerberos and the ISO protocol standards

#1709
From: Marshall Rose
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1989 19:26
18 lines
1262 bytes
Jim - there are three cases of standardization work:

1. Where there is exactly one de facto standard for a particular kind of
technology.  In this case, standardization is fairly straight-forward.

2. Where there is more than one way of doing it in use, e.g., CO- and CL-
mode networking.  In this case, the committees often take the bells and
whistles of each, e.g., the OSI network layer.

3. There there is no de facto standard, e.g., the application layer framework.
In this case, the committees often engage in what might be mistermed
"research", e.g., the OSI appliation layer structure.

Your analysis is correct in case 1.  In cases 2 and 3, we usually get truly
horrible stuff (e.g., the OSI network layer and the OSI appliation layer
structure) for different reasons, which should both be obvious.

/mtr
Technical Details
Message-ID: <20750.630012382@cheetah.nyser.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!decwrl!ucbvax!CHEETAH.NYSER.NET!mrose
References: <16365.629989412@tis.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!decwrl!ucbvax!CHEETAH.NYSER.NET!mrose
From: mrose@CHEETAH.NYSER.NET (Marshall Rose)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso
Subject: Re: kerberos and the ISO protocol standards
Message-ID: <20750.630012382@cheetah.nyser.net>
Date: 18 Dec 89 19:26:22 GMT
References: <16365.629989412@tis.com>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: iso@nic.ddn.mil
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 18