Article View: comp.protocols.iso
Article #1763Re: X.500 Nonsense: Summary
From: Steve Kille
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1990 16:39
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1990 16:39
19 lines
1116 bytes
1116 bytes
>From: Martin Chapman <mcsun!ukc!axion!planet!mdc@net.uu.uunet> >Subject: X.500 Nonsense: Summary >Date: 12 Feb 90 14:09:56 GMT >>There are probably one or two people in the world who have a reasonable >>understanding of X.500. Looks like I needed to be a bit clearer, as my sarcasm clearly went over some heads! Also this line is being quoted out of context - at the same time I pointed out two people very close to you who have a pretty good idea about X.500. X.500 does take quite a bit of effort to get to grips with. However, a lot of people have done so, and there are plenty of implementations. Steve
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1816.635099984@UK.AC.UCL.CS>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!CS.UCL.AC.UK!S.KilleReferences:
<1990Feb12.140956.27362@planet.bt.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!CS.UCL.AC.UK!S.Kille From: S.Kille@CS.UCL.AC.UK (Steve Kille) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso Subject: Re: X.500 Nonsense: Summary Message-ID: <1816.635099984@UK.AC.UCL.CS> Date: 15 Feb 90 16:39:44 GMT References: <1990Feb12.140956.27362@planet.bt.co.uk> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 19