Article View: comp.protocols.iso
Article #177Re: Upper layers security
From: Gray Girling
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 1989 09:28
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 1989 09:28
10 lines
1060 bytes
1060 bytes
The transport and network layer are good places to support encipherment, but if you want the added efficiency of selective field based security or if you require non-repudiation (using digital signatures) 7498-2 says you must use the upper layers to provide it. So some way to deal with encipherment in the upper layers will eventually be standardized. The version of 7498-2 I have implies that selective field confidentiality could be provided in the Application layer. Given the logical difference between the syntax used in two AEIs, encipherment (as usually understood) would not seem to be an applicable mechanism. So how could you do it?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6381.8907050928@ralph.topexp.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!iuvax!cica!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!topexpress.co.UK!cggShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!iuvax!cica!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!topexpress.co.UK!cgg From: cgg@topexpress.co.UK (Gray Girling) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso Subject: Re: Upper layers security Message-ID: <6381.8907050928@ralph.topexp.co.uk> Date: 5 Jul 89 09:28:50 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 10