Re: Status of ISO RPC

Article View: comp.protocols.iso

Article #187

Back to comp.protocols.iso Previous Next

#187

From: Christian Huitema
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 1989 06:44

2 lines
616 bytes

As ROS appears to many as having pretty much the same purpose as RPC, 
could you comment on the differences + the rationales for yet another standard?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8907190644.AA17227@jerry.inria.fr>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!cica!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!MIRSA.INRIA.FR!Christian.Huitema

References: <8907180910.AA09488@hplms2.hpl.hp.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!cica!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!MIRSA.INRIA.FR!Christian.Huitema
From: Christian.Huitema@MIRSA.INRIA.FR (Christian Huitema)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso
Subject: Re: Status of ISO RPC
Message-ID: <8907190644.AA17227@jerry.inria.fr>
Date: 19 Jul 89 06:44:40 GMT
References: <8907180910.AA09488@hplms2.hpl.hp.com>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 2

Reply to Parent Message