🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.protocols.iso
Article #312

Re: TP0-4 question (novice level)

#312
From: Alex McKenzie
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 1989 20:12
12 lines
1185 bytes
The cost people were trying to avoid is coding (and memory space) cost,
not execution cost.  I won't argue whether or not people should have
been concerned about these costs, but they were.  The argument was that
if they could count on a network layer that either delivered data
reliably or reset the connection, why should they be obliged to
implement a complicated Transport Layer.  They similarly argued for
"null" or highly specialized Session, Presentation, and Application
layers in many cases.  Of course politics and religion are also present
in these discussions, but you said you weren't interested in those.

Alex McKenzie
 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <46993@bbn.COM>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!bbn!bbn.com!mckenzie
References: <2549@hub.UUCP> <1989Oct16.173618.25068@agate.berkeley.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!bbn!bbn.com!mckenzie
From: mckenzie@bbn.com (Alex McKenzie)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso
Subject: Re: TP0-4 question (novice level)
Keywords: TP
Message-ID: <46993@bbn.COM>
Date: 16 Oct 89 20:12:33 GMT
References: <2549@hub.UUCP> <1989Oct16.173618.25068@agate.berkeley.edu>
Sender: news@bbn.COM
Reply-To: mckenzie@labs-n.bbn.com (Alex McKenzie)
Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA
Lines: 12