🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.protocols.iso
Article #327

NSAP address formats

#327
From: Hein{nen Juha
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 1989 10:52
13 lines
971 bytes
The NSAP address format in GOSIP 2.0 seems to be different that any of
the two routable address formats (nbs, osinet) supported by the recent
SunLink OSI 6.0 implementation.  Any ideas why there is this
difference and what to do about it?

The next version of Cisco router software also supports ISO IP.  Does
anyone know which address formats its routing is based on?  Are we
expecting to see conformance to the GOSIP 2.0 format and if so, how
long will it take?

--
--	Juha Heinanen, Tampere Univ. of Technology, Finland
	jh@tut.fi (Internet), tut!jh (UUCP), jh@tut (Bitnet)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <JH.89Oct20125224@tikka.tut.fi>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!ucsd!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!sunic!tut!jh

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!ucsd!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!sunic!tut!jh
From: jh@tut.fi (Hein{nen Juha)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso
Subject: NSAP address formats
Message-ID: <JH.89Oct20125224@tikka.tut.fi>
Date: 20 Oct 89 10:52:24 GMT
Sender: News@tut.fi
Distribution: comp
Organization: Tampere Univ. of Technology, Finland.
Lines: 13