Article View: comp.protocols.iso
Article #327NSAP address formats
From: Hein{nen Juha
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 1989 10:52
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 1989 10:52
13 lines
971 bytes
971 bytes
The NSAP address format in GOSIP 2.0 seems to be different that any of the two routable address formats (nbs, osinet) supported by the recent SunLink OSI 6.0 implementation. Any ideas why there is this difference and what to do about it? The next version of Cisco router software also supports ISO IP. Does anyone know which address formats its routing is based on? Are we expecting to see conformance to the GOSIP 2.0 format and if so, how long will it take? -- -- Juha Heinanen, Tampere Univ. of Technology, Finland jh@tut.fi (Internet), tut!jh (UUCP), jh@tut (Bitnet)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<JH.89Oct20125224@tikka.tut.fi>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!ucsd!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!sunic!tut!jhShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!ucsd!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!sunic!tut!jh
From: jh@tut.fi (Hein{nen Juha)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso
Subject: NSAP address formats
Message-ID: <JH.89Oct20125224@tikka.tut.fi>
Date: 20 Oct 89 10:52:24 GMT
Sender: News@tut.fi
Distribution: comp
Organization: Tampere Univ. of Technology, Finland.
Lines: 13