Re: Encoding RFC 1006 addresses in X.500

Article View: comp.protocols.iso

Article #405

Back to comp.protocols.iso Previous Next

#405

From: Steve Kille
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1990 08:50

10 lines
745 bytes

Marshall,

Can I add my voice to Christian's, in support of adding in the NSAP to
a modified version of RFC 1006.  This will help the addressing problem
significantly when real CONS/CLNS are available.   I believe this to
be an important hook.

Adding in an ARP-like feature seems inappropriate.

Steve

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1199.632652618@UK.AC.UCL.CS>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!CS.UCL.AC.UK!S.Kille

References: <18945.632511213@cheetah.nyser.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!CS.UCL.AC.UK!S.Kille
From: S.Kille@CS.UCL.AC.UK (Steve Kille)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso
Subject: Re: Encoding RFC 1006 addresses in X.500
Message-ID: <1199.632652618@UK.AC.UCL.CS>
Date: 18 Jan 90 08:50:18 GMT
References: <18945.632511213@cheetah.nyser.net>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message