Article View: comp.protocols.iso
Article #504Re: ISO Procedures
From: Alex McKenzie
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1992 21:07
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1992 21:07
40 lines
2622 bytes
2622 bytes
In article <BtA8Jx.EMC@immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> mskuhn@immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Markus Kuhn) writes: } ... If it is intended to be a democratic }process, how can highly motivated independent people (e.g. like me ;-) }have influence on the standardisation process without being employed in }the marketing department of a huge company? As noted by another poster, ISO is a federation of national standards organizations. The German member (at least in the realm of OSI) is DIN. I have no idea how DIN determines whether a particular individual can become a member of the DIN delegation. In the US, at least, the member (ANSI) wants to be sure that each individual knows enough about the national position on each issue to be able to avoid taking a position contrary to the national position. This is generally assured by requiring that each individual be an active member (attending and participating in meetings which develop the national position) of the member organization for a while before going to an ISO meeting. In addition to formal requirements, it is my experience that in any committee (not only standards committees) the amount of influence an individual has is related to how much the other committee members "respect" the individual (by "respect" I mean something like "have the sense that the individual has thought through positions taken, and can be relied on to work on seeing other points of view and seeking solutions that satisfy many needs"). This "respect" normally arises from working with someone over a period of time. Both the formal and informal "requirements" make it necessary (in my experience) for an individual to dedicate a lot of time, and do a lot of international traveling, before having much effect on international standards. That probably has the effect of making it impossible for _most_ highly motivated but independent people to have influence on the standardisation process. I should add that my experience with ANSI and ISO was in the early 80's, but I doubt that anything is significantly different today. Alex McKenzie
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<l9l897INNr26@news.bbn.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!news.bbn.com!bbn.com!mckenzieReferences:
<BtA8Jx.EMC@immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!news.bbn.com!bbn.com!mckenzie From: mckenzie@bbn.com (Alex McKenzie) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso Subject: Re: ISO Procedures Date: 25 Aug 1992 21:07:51 GMT Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA Lines: 40 Message-ID: <l9l897INNr26@news.bbn.com> References: <BtA8Jx.EMC@immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Reply-To: mckenzie@labs-n.bbn.com (Alex McKenzie) NNTP-Posting-Host: bbn.com Keywords: ISO, Standards