🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <id.ZIRS.GD@ferranti.com>, peter@ferranti.com (peter da silva) writes:
|> As X.400 gets more common, I'm getting more and more bounces. Worse, I'm
|> getting bounces from replies to messages originated in X.400 land, where
|> the gateway didn't put an unambiguous address in the sender field. Because
|> there is no such thing as an unambiguous address in X.400.
|> 
 
Sorry, I do not understand these sentences, the information in them seem to be
very strange to me.

1) Why should the gateway put an address in the sender field?
2) What do you mean with unambiguous address?
3) Why do you think that X.400 does not know such thing like an unambiguous 
   address?
4) What are you doing with an address of the sender field in a reply?

-- 

Michael Storz
================================================================================
                                      !   X.400 : G=michael;S=storz;OU1=lrz;
   Leibniz-Rechenzentrum              !           P=lrz-muenchen;A=dbp;C=de
   Barer Str. 21                      !   RFC822: storz@lrz.lrz-muenchen.dbp.de
   8000 Muenchen 2                    !   Fax   : ++ 49 89 2809460
   Germany                            !   Tel   : ++ 49 89 2105 7420
================================================================================