🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.protocols.iso
Article #591

Vote for/against "comp.protocols.iso.migration"

#591
From: Kwang Sung
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 1990 03:09
104 lines
4989 bytes
>From: bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield)  wrote:
>Sender: news@MorningStar.COM (USENET Administrator)
>Organization: Morning Star Technologies


Hi...

	Upon Bob's request, I would like to take a normal procedure in order
to create a new newsgroup "comp.protocols.iso.migration" so that nobody can
bother existing newsgroup either "comp.protocols.iso" or "comp.protocols.
tcp-ip" any more.

>if its regular readers were calling for help in the form of another,
>more focused group and list (they aren't), then the group should be
>called comp.protocols.iso.migration, in order to fit in with the
>established naming structure.

>I'd suggest you follow the common newsgroup creation procedure: set up
>a mailing list, broadcast its existence to all appropriate, interested
>forums (e.g. the existing ISO forums), and invite all interested
>parties to join.  When the traffic becomes too heavy for members'
>mailboxes, you'll have a particularly strong case to call for a new
>newsgroup.  At that time, ask someone to help you set up a gateway
>between your iso-migration list and the new c.p.i.m newsgroup.  And
>you have my permission, in advance, to say "I told you so" :-)

>You have asked the folks there whether they're interested in
>segmenting their discussions.  From their responses, I see neither the
>need or the mandate.

	First of all, this new newsgroup can be grouped by anybody who is
interested in migration/transition to OSI. You may discuss any technical
or non-technical issues on any protocols/strategies which might be helpful
to migrate/transit to OSI world. Here are about 40 persons who responded to
my postings so far. I would like to vote whether we need to create such a new 
newsgroup.  Please vote, and e-mail either me or post temporarily at 
"comp.protocols.iso", NOT at "comp.protocols.tcp-ip". After I collect those
info, I will re-post the result at both "comp.protocols.iso" and 
"comp.protocols.tcp-ip". Here is the mailing list, and if you are interested
in joining this new newsgroup, please vote.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield)
goldstein@carafe.enet.dec.com (Fred R. Goldstein)
oberman@rogue.llnl.gov
cperry@STARBASE.MITRE.ORG (Chris Perry)
Amit Parghi <uunet!watmath!watcgl.waterloo.edu!aparghi>
Bill Streilein <nsc!wellfleet.com!bstreile>
CLIFF@UCBCMSA (Cliff Frost {415} 642-5360)
uunet!elroy.Jpl.Nasa.Gov!david (David Robinson)
dennis@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca (Dennis Ferguson)
Stef@NRTC.NORTHROP.COM (Einar Stefferud)
uunet!proteon.com!gmalkin (Gary Scott Malkin(GONE))
grieve@cos.com (David Grieve)
uunet!wrs!yuba!hwajin (Hwa Jin Bae)
att!lzaz!jer
jessop@rlgvax.OPCR.ICL.COM (Lynn Jessop)
uunet!unx.dec.com!jjf (8N8-FRANEY)
nsc!asylum.sf.ca.us!karl (Karl Auerbach)
keith@excelan.COM (Keith Brown)
Hakiml Laraqui  <uunet!sics.se!laraqui>
ncr-sd!ncrcae!lhybl
louie@SAYSHELL.UMD.EDU (Louis A. Mamakos)
uunet!uu.psi.com!schoff (Martin L. Schoffstall)
David Hayes <uunet!csvax.seas.smu.edu!merlin>
uunet!ukc.ac.uk!mhs
mrose@CHEETAH.NYSER.NET (Marshall Rose)
vaillan@ireq.hydro.qc.ca (Clement Vaillancourt)
nelson@sun.soe.clarkson.edu (Russ Nelson)
richardt@Legato.COM
saunders@gesundheit.West.Sun.Com (Gene Saunders)
schoff@PSI.COM ("Martin Lee Schoffstall")
Einar Stefferud <voder!ucbvax!nrtc.northrop.com!Stef>
Steven Willis <nsc!amdahl!ames!harvard!talcott!wellflt!swillis>
torben@FORALIE.ICS.HAWAII.EDU (Torben Nielsen)
uunet!sacto.West.Sun.COM!sparc2!ts (Troy Schumaker)
amanda@mermaid.intercon.com (Amanda Walker)
curt@dtix.dt.navy.mil (Welch)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>In summary, we should continue discussing migration issues in the
>existing forum.  When the popular mandate arises for a new forum,
>create it as a mailing list.  When the mailing list becomes too busy,
>establish a gateway to a newsgroup named comp.protocols.iso.migration.

	Thanks, Bob... and, from my previous postings, I would like to
apologize to some persons, if they felt hurt from me. I am sure this new
newsgroup will resolve our networking future, and will give us a right 
direction. Thanks.



					Kwang Sung
					Informix Software, Inc.
					4100 Bohannon Dr.
					Menlo Park, CA 94025
					415 / 926 - 6758 (O)
					UUCP: ...!uunet!infmx!kwang

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: Those opinions are mine alone, not my employers'.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4474@infmx.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!munnari.oz.au!uhccux!ames!ucsd!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!bbn.com!orc!decwrl!nsc!pyramid!infmx!kwang

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!munnari.oz.au!uhccux!ames!ucsd!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!bbn.com!orc!decwrl!nsc!pyramid!infmx!kwang
From: kwang@infmx.UUCP (Kwang Sung)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso
Subject: Vote for/against "comp.protocols.iso.migration"
Message-ID: <4474@infmx.UUCP>
Date: 12 Jun 90 03:09:47 GMT
Reply-To: kwang@infmx.UUCP (Kwang Sung)
Organization: Informix, Menlo Park, Ca. U.S.A.
Lines: 104