Article View: comp.protocols.iso
Article #672Re: X.224 (Transport) state table question
From: harald.alvestrand
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 1990 07:32
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 1990 07:32
20 lines
1319 bytes
1319 bytes
In article <1990Aug6.235903.23530@mel.dit.csiro.au>,
ajw@mel.dit.csiro.au (Andrew Waugh) writes:
> Class 0 Transport only uses the implicit variant of normal release
> (see 6.7.1).
Sorry, but no. This bit me too, once.
DRs ARE used in class zero, but ONLY to refuse incoming CRs.
This is done so you can pass the disconnect code, I think.
The procedure in ISO 8073-1986 (I think this has the same numbering as
X.224) is
in chapter 6.6 (connection refusal), not 6.7 (normal release).
So my question, rephrased, is:
After completing the refusal procedure in 6.6.3, when, if ever, should
the responder
disconnect the network connection?
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
ISO hacker
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Aug7.073250.24459@idt.unit.no>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!rochester!kodak!uupsi!sunic!nuug!sigyn.idt.unit.no!lear!htaReferences:
<1990Aug6.111420.13755@idt.unit.no> <1990Aug6.235903.23530@mel.dit.csiro.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!rochester!kodak!uupsi!sunic!nuug!sigyn.idt.unit.no!lear!hta From: harald.alvestrand@elab-runit.sintef.no Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso Subject: Re: X.224 (Transport) state table question Keywords: TP0 Message-ID: <1990Aug7.073250.24459@idt.unit.no> Date: 7 Aug 90 07:32:50 GMT References: <1990Aug6.111420.13755@idt.unit.no> <1990Aug6.235903.23530@mel.dit.csiro.au> Sender: news@idt.unit.no (Usenet news admin) Reply-To: harald.alvestrand@elab-runit.sintef.no Organization: ELAB-RUNIT, SINTEF, Norway Lines: 20