🚀 go-pugleaf

Hi Folks, 

In line with Isaac's question, see attached, what are the addressing
consequences or issues for a PRMD user associated with an ADMD that 
spans international boundaries? In other words, a PRMD connected to a
supra-ADMD? 

Should we seek to recognize a reserved Country Code like 
PrintableString "XX" and NumbericString "000" and seek to set 
up an international registry for those ADMDs wishing to operate as 
a supra-ADMD. 

Would an ADMD serving PRMDs in other countries, but not offering 
subscriber services to residents in that country, as suggested 
in Isaac's message, be considered a supra-ADMD?  What are the 
international law, billing, currency and settlement issues surrounding 
such a venture? 

Should this discussion and ultimate solution, if there is one that
can be agreed, find its way into the CCITT/ISO standards arena as 
a US contribution?  Should the ITU be approached to set up such a service?

How much unlike is this from the interworking and addressing issues 
created by a supra-PRMDs?

Dick J. 
AT&T Bell Labs

=====================================================
>>We are now beginning to understand the issues involved in attaching a PRMD
>>to multiple ADMDs within a country.
>>
>>Draft British Standard Specification for Electronic Messaging Implementing 
>>ISO/IEC 10021 in the United Kingdom describes the UK approach to these 
>>problems.
>>
>>Has anyone have any thought on what should happens when a PRMD in a country 
>>without any ADMDs wishes to use the services of an ADMDs in a different 
>>countries.  Does it means that they will have to use a foreign country code
>>for themselves?  What happens when this PRMD wants to use the services of
>>different ADMDs in different countries at different times?  Do they need
>>to use different country codes and therefore have different ORaddresses 
>>depending on which ADMD they use for the message?  Or is this allowed at all?
>>
>>
>>Isaac Chan, Consumers Software Inc.
>>isaac@gui.consumers.com