Article View: comp.protocols.iso
Article #690Re: PRMD and ADMDs in different countries
From: Erik Skovgaard
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 1990 23:41
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 1990 23:41
15 lines
1028 bytes
1028 bytes
Re. the multi-national ADMD
In my opinion, such an ADMD should choose which country it belongs in
or else register its name in multiple countries. In the latter case
it would then be considered multiple separate MTAs for routing
purposes.
Why make routing more complicated? Most of the cases, that have been
presented as possible routing problems, would only be encountered
very rarely, so why not simply disallow these extreme cases.
To get on my soapbox: standards should help interoperability, not
needlessly complicate it.
....Erik.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<134*eskovgaa@uvcw.UVic.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uunet!decwrl!ucbvax!UVCW.UVIC.CA!eskovgaaReferences:
<9008172123.AA15543@relay.CDNnet.CA>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uunet!decwrl!ucbvax!UVCW.UVIC.CA!eskovgaa From: eskovgaa@UVCW.UVIC.CA (Erik Skovgaard) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso Subject: Re: PRMD and ADMDs in different countries Message-ID: <134*eskovgaa@uvcw.UVic.ca> Date: 17 Aug 90 23:41:00 GMT References: <9008172123.AA15543@relay.CDNnet.CA> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 15