Re: UUCP over X.25

Article View: comp.protocols.iso

Article #756

Back to comp.protocols.iso Previous Next

#756

From: Erik Naggum
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 1990 21:21

10 lines
1275 bytes

Is there something which would handle X.25 Reset Requests correctly?
Most software I've had to look at get totally confused when they occur
and most drop the line.  Some simple protocol should use X.25 as a
network service and decide on some resynchronization points and take
it up from there.  Too difficult?  Or is that what AT&T did with their
UUCP over X.25 protocol, which hasn't become very popular?
--
[Erik Naggum]		Naggum Software; Gaustadalleen 21; 0371 OSLO; NORWAY
	I disclaim,	<erik@naggum.uu.no>, <enag@ifi.uio.no>
  therefore I post.	+47-295-8622, +47-256-7822, (fax) +47-260-4427

Technical Details

Message-ID: <ENAG.90Sep23232139@hild.ifi.uio.no>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!sunic!nuug!ifi!enag

References: <1990Aug30.125754.5192@hq.demos.su> <127350@pyramid.pyramid.com> <1990Sep20.171848.22655@scuzzy.in-berlin.de>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!sunic!nuug!ifi!enag
From: enag@ifi.uio.no (Erik Naggum)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso,comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: UUCP over X.25
Message-ID: <ENAG.90Sep23232139@hild.ifi.uio.no>
Date: 23 Sep 90 21:21:53 GMT
References: <1990Aug30.125754.5192@hq.demos.su> <127350@pyramid.pyramid.com>
 <1990Sep20.171848.22655@scuzzy.in-berlin.de>
Sender: enag@ifi.uio.no (Erik Naggum)
Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway
Lines: 10
Nntp-Posting-Host: hild.ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: src@scuzzy.in-berlin.de's message of 20 Sep 90 17:18:48 GMT
Originator: enag@hild

Reply to Parent Message