Article View: comp.protocols.iso
Article #864Re: Your Chance to Influence POSIX!
From: Craig Partridge
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 1990 20:42
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 1990 20:42
17 lines
1197 bytes
1197 bytes
In article <39762@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> dot12@okeeffe.berkeley.edu (P1003.12 Committee) writes:
>The working solution the commitee had been pursuing was to combine
>the the best features of the two interfaces, changing the names and
>semantics of the primitives, so that some amount of re-coding would
>be necessary.
Keith et. al.
Pardon the public reply but I had a question I thought others
might find of interest.
Were the changes being considered inconsistent with having libraries
that implemented the socket and/or XTI interfaces on top of them? I.e.
could a vendor implement a socket library that called the P1003.12
primitives?
Craig
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<61139@bbn.BBN.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!sci.ccny.cuny.edu!phri!cmcl2!hsdndev!bbn.com!craigReferences:
<39762@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!sci.ccny.cuny.edu!phri!cmcl2!hsdndev!bbn.com!craig From: craig@bbn.com (Craig Partridge) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso Subject: Re: Your Chance to Influence POSIX! Message-ID: <61139@bbn.BBN.COM> Date: 27 Nov 90 20:42:59 GMT References: <39762@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> Sender: news@bbn.com Reply-To: craig@ws6.nnsc.nsf.net.BBN.COM (Craig Partridge) Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA Lines: 17