🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.protocols.iso
Article #868

Session requirements negotiation

#868
From: Isaac
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 1990 19:20
17 lines
1112 bytes
Dear OSI gurus,

According to X.215, section 12.1.2.7,

  "... additional SS-user session requirements which were not included in the 
  indication, may be included in the response.  SS-user session requirements 
  that are proposed in both the indication and the response are the ones 
  selected for use on the session connection."

This section has been bugging me for years.  Can anyone tell me the advantage 
of allowing the responding SS-user to propose additional SS-user session 
requirements that it knows already that these will not be selected for use 
anyway?

Thanks in advance for any enlightening thoughts.  Puzzled,

Isaac Chan, Consumers Software Inc. <Isaac@gui.consumers.com>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <275AA57B@gui.consumers.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!ucsd!ucbvax!gui.consumers.com!Isaac

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!ucsd!ucbvax!gui.consumers.com!Isaac
From: Isaac@gui.consumers.com
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso
Subject: Session requirements negotiation
Message-ID: <275AA57B@gui.consumers.com>
Date: 3 Dec 90 19:20:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 17