Article View: comp.protocols.iso
Article #312Re: TP0-4 question (novice level)
From: Alex McKenzie
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 1989 20:12
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 1989 20:12
12 lines
1185 bytes
1185 bytes
The cost people were trying to avoid is coding (and memory space) cost, not execution cost. I won't argue whether or not people should have been concerned about these costs, but they were. The argument was that if they could count on a network layer that either delivered data reliably or reset the connection, why should they be obliged to implement a complicated Transport Layer. They similarly argued for "null" or highly specialized Session, Presentation, and Application layers in many cases. Of course politics and religion are also present in these discussions, but you said you weren't interested in those. Alex McKenzie
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<46993@bbn.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!bbn!bbn.com!mckenzieReferences:
<2549@hub.UUCP> <1989Oct16.173618.25068@agate.berkeley.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!bbn!bbn.com!mckenzie From: mckenzie@bbn.com (Alex McKenzie) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso Subject: Re: TP0-4 question (novice level) Keywords: TP Message-ID: <46993@bbn.COM> Date: 16 Oct 89 20:12:33 GMT References: <2549@hub.UUCP> <1989Oct16.173618.25068@agate.berkeley.edu> Sender: news@bbn.COM Reply-To: mckenzie@labs-n.bbn.com (Alex McKenzie) Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA Lines: 12