Re: patches

Article View: comp.protocols.kerberos

Article #843

Back to comp.protocols.kerberos Previous Next

#843

From: Alan Crosswell
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 22:04

16 lines
1243 bytes

In article <9212161556.AA06288@cc.vt.edu> bagley@cc.vt.edu (Victor L. Bagley)  
writes:
> If I get the dist/921209 kerberos software from Athena.mit.edu,  
> Should I then run patch on patchlevel 10 using the  
> cukrb4.niospell.patch from Columbia.  If so has anyone done this  
> successfully?  I am trying ever so hard to port this software to a  
> Next machine.  And no I am not ready to use the machine as a door  
> stop. : )
> Thanks....

The Columbia stuff is patchlevel 9 PLUS some stuff posted to this list
by Georgia Tech that I had picked up.  So it is not compatible with
the latest MIT distribution.  Have you tried the MIT stuff on the NeXT
without the Columbia stuff?  I imagine they may have added the necessary
changes for it to work on a NeXT.
/a

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Dec16.220421.15938@news.columbia.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.columbia.edu!usenet

References: <9212161556.AA06288@cc.vt.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kerberos
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.columbia.edu!usenet
From: alan@curta.cc.columbia.edu (Alan Crosswell)
Subject: Re: patches
Message-ID: <1992Dec16.220421.15938@news.columbia.edu>
Sender: usenet@news.columbia.edu (The Network News)
Nntp-Posting-Host: curta.cc.columbia.edu
Organization: Columbia University
References: <9212161556.AA06288@cc.vt.edu>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 22:04:21 GMT
Lines: 16

Reply to Parent Message