Article View: comp.protocols.misc
Article #302SLIP: Why are people so reluctant to use it?
From: Terry Lee
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 1990 22:56
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 1990 22:56
23 lines
1450 bytes
1450 bytes
I need to configure a TCP network, where sizzling performance is not necessary. In fact, the primary user of the net will be UUCP. I'm trying to minimize routers, bridges, etc. where not necessary, so things like SLIP look very promising. However, it seems that everyone I ask about SLIP seems to speak ill of it, and curiously mostly "heard that it's bad" not "used it and it was bad." I hear comments about it being slow, but is it SLIP, or merely the serial line? E.g., what does one expect off a 9.6k line? I did hear one concrete complaint; that SLIP does not do error correcting efficiently (or at all?)- is this true? I have used SLIP, but from a user standpoint a couple of years ago. It wasn't the fastest when running RFS over it, but it was cheaper than buying an ether- net board. So in summary, is SLIP all that bad? Are there other relatively standard methods of running TCP without sizable investments in hardware? Thanks in advance- Terry Lee tslee@oracle.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Oct16.225610.3505@oracle.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!fernwood!oracle!newsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!fernwood!oracle!news From: tslee@oracle.uucp (Terry Lee) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.misc Subject: SLIP: Why are people so reluctant to use it? Message-ID: <1990Oct16.225610.3505@oracle.com> Date: 16 Oct 90 22:56:10 GMT Reply-To: tslee@oracle.uucp (Terry Lee) Distribution: na Organization: Oracle Corporation, Belmont, CA Lines: 23