Article View: comp.protocols.misc
Article #322Re: SLIP: Why are people so reluctant to use it?
From: Bob Sutterfield
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 1990 16:38
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 1990 16:38
23 lines
1815 bytes
1815 bytes
In article <72778@sgi.sgi.com> vjs@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com (Vernon Schryver) writes:
In article <966@lafayet.UUCP>, rob@lafayet.UUCP (Rob Freyder) writes:
What if you want to connect two remote systems via Telebit T2500
in PEP mode ? Is this reasonable ?
SLIP/PEP works fine for FTP, giving ~1000 Bytes/second transfer
rates, but less than the 1400 Bytes/sec. you can get with a pair of
PEP modems doing UUCP.
PPP (with compressed headers) gives 1.3-1.5Kb/sec FTP throughput over
a PEP connection, which is getting close to the advertised bandwidth.
I've forgotten whether that's with in-modem compression turned on, but
I suspect not.
For interactive use, SLIP or not, the v.32 mode of T2500's (and
others) is probably better, even if the file transfer rate for
FTP/SLIP/v.32 is <960 Bytes/sec.
...if you're able to maintain a V.32 carrier over a particular call.
There are some places where PEP will get only 3-400 bps for UUCP or
Xmodem, but nobody complains because nothing else will even latch a
carrier because of the rotten lines. Probably not as much of a
problem in the industrialized world as around the Indian Ocean.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BOB.90Oct22123751@volitans.MorningStar.Com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mstar!mstar.morningstar.com!bobReferences:
<1990Oct16.225610.3505@oracle.com> <966@lafayet.UUCP> <72778@sgi.sgi.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mstar!mstar.morningstar.com!bob From: bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.misc Subject: Re: SLIP: Why are people so reluctant to use it? Message-ID: <BOB.90Oct22123751@volitans.MorningStar.Com> Date: 22 Oct 90 16:38:05 GMT References: <1990Oct16.225610.3505@oracle.com> <966@lafayet.UUCP> <72778@sgi.sgi.com> Sender: usenet@MorningStar.COM (USENET Administrator) Reply-To: bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield) Organization: Morning Star Technologies Lines: 23 In-Reply-To: vjs@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com's message of 20 Oct 90 19:02:22 GMT