RE: A comparison of Commercial RPC Systems

Article View: comp.protocols.misc

Article #76

Back to comp.protocols.misc Previous Next

#76

From: Stephen Tihor
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 1989 01:49

8 lines
688 bytes

When SUN chose not to use TCP which is inteded to do much of this work
they had to choose to either close their eyes and pray or to implement
the missing functionality in other ways.

It seems that they relaced a sledge hammer with a ballpeen and a prayer to save
weight.

-------

Technical Details

Message-ID: <21277ED63.0000422E.1989@CMCL1.CMCL1.NYU.EDU.ARPA>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!cmcl1.nyu.edu!TIHOR

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!cmcl1.nyu.edu!TIHOR
From: TIHOR@cmcl1.nyu.edu (Stephen Tihor)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.misc
Subject: RE: A comparison of Commercial RPC Systems
Message-ID: <21277ED63.0000422E.1989@CMCL1.CMCL1.NYU.EDU.ARPA>
Date: 1 Aug 89 01:49:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 8