🚀 go-pugleaf

Nat mishkin@apollo.com writes:
>In article <9574@joshua.athertn.Atherton.COM> joshua@atherton.com writes:
>>    1. If for any reason UDP does not work, a person using Sun's RPC system
>>       can use TCP.  (This option is not available to Apollo's RPC users,
>>       but is available to Netwise RPC users.)  
>
>Look:  The theory is that the option is simply not necessary.  You pose
>the point as if it is a deficiency with that the application isn't obliged
>to make the consideration as to what underlying protocol to use.  I just
>don't see it that way.  

This is an important difference between us. I say that some applications are
better suited for UDP, others for TCP or VMTP.  Since the application 
programmer understands his application the best, he should choose which 
protocol to use.  You say that NCS's beefed up UDP protocol is always the 
best, for all (or almost all) applications.  This may be true in the future.
(I doubt it, though).  It is certainly not true now.

If we ever do find a single communications protocol which is best for all 
(or almost all) applications we should call it HGP, standing for "Holy
Grail Protocol." :-)  In the meantime vendors should provide flexible RPC 
systems.


Joshua Levy
--------                Quote: "The Street finds its own uses for technology."
Addresses:                                  -- William Gibbson
joshua@atherton.com          
{decwrl|sun|hpda}!athertn!joshua    work:(408)734-9822    home:(415)968-3718