Fakerscope 3000 vs. Network Probe 6630

Article View: comp.protocols.misc

Article #843

Back to comp.protocols.misc Previous Next

#843

From: Charles Lambert
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 1988 15:40

14 lines
1019 bytes

I am considering buying either a Fakerscope 3000 or a Network Probe 6630 to
diagnose communication problems.  The system under test uses an in-house
packet protocol carried by RS232 and RS422 links.  We need to capture and
inspect packets, ideally up to 256 characters long,  and occasionally to
synthesise such packets so that we can emulate a communicating unit.

Has anyone used either or both of these instruments?  Can you give me a
comparative assessment?

Send e-mail to cl@datlog.co.uk or {backbone site}!ukc!datlog!cl and I will
post a summary.

----------
Charlie

Technical Details

Message-ID: <862@dlhpedg.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!ukc!stl!stc!datlog!dlhpedg!cl

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!ukc!stl!stc!datlog!dlhpedg!cl
From: cl@datlog.co.uk (Charles Lambert)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.misc,comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Fakerscope 3000 vs. Network Probe 6630
Message-ID: <862@dlhpedg.co.uk>
Date: 21 Sep 88 15:40:43 GMT
Sender: news@dlhpedg.co.uk
Reply-To: cl@datlog.co.uk (Charles Lambert)
Organization: FSD@Data Logic Ltd, Queens House, Greenhill Way, Harrow, London.
Lines: 14