Other fun arguments

Article View: comp.protocols.misc

Article #875

Back to comp.protocols.misc Previous Next

#875

From: Stan Switzer
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 1988 14:56

13 lines
1021 bytes

In article <570@interlan.UUCP> backman@interlan.UUCP (Larry Backman) writes:
> 	This argument is fun, its one of those religious wars that has no
> 	correct answer.  Another good one (next time) is the correct hardware
> 	architecture needed to do fastt protocols.

And after we thrash that one out we might consider the question of the
correct protocol architecture for fast communications.

Speaking only for myself,

Stan Switzer  sjs@ctt.bellcore.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <11336@bellcore.bellcore.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!ukma!rutgers!bellcore!jcricket!sjs

References:

<Oct.16.15.09.26.1988.269@zydeco.rutgers.edu> <132@icarus.kulcs.uucp> <Oct.21.13.38.50.1988.528@zydeco.rutgers.edu> <570@interlan.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!ukma!rutgers!bellcore!jcricket!sjs
From: sjs@jcricket.ctt.bellcore.com (Stan Switzer)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.misc
Subject: Other fun arguments
Message-ID: <11336@bellcore.bellcore.com>
Date: 27 Oct 88 14:56:45 GMT
References: <Oct.16.15.09.26.1988.269@zydeco.rutgers.edu> <132@icarus.kulcs.uucp> <Oct.21.13.38.50.1988.528@zydeco.rutgers.edu> <570@interlan.UUCP>
Sender: news@bellcore.bellcore.com
Reply-To: sjs@ctt.bellcore.com (Stan Switzer)
Organization: Bellcore
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message