Article View: comp.protocols.misc
Article #935Re: Subliminal
From: Marc T. Kaufman
Date: Sun, 09 Apr 1989 01:43
Date: Sun, 09 Apr 1989 01:43
17 lines
1342 bytes
1342 bytes
In article <6462@medusa.cs.purdue.edu> rjh@cs.purdue.EDU (Bob Hathaway) writes: -[This is a comment on RFC 1097, which provides a standard for sending -and receiving subliminal messages across the internet. Since newsgroups -are a potential victim of subliminal messages, I'm cross-posting this -article.] - ...People should be afraid to look at terminals if -there is a possibility subliminal messages are being sent. Why isn't this -practice illegal? I vote for a complete banning of subliminal messages from -any electronic medium and propose for now a banning of subliminal messages -across the Internet. Subliminal messages are a dangerous threat to our -security and the integrity of the Internet. - The price of freedom is eternal digilence. and the price of eternal digilence [sic] is eternal gullibility
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8295@polya.Stanford.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!decwrl!labrea!polya!kaufmanReferences:
<6462@medusa.cs.purdue.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!decwrl!labrea!polya!kaufman From: kaufman@polya.Stanford.EDU (Marc T. Kaufman) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.misc Subject: Re: Subliminal Keywords: RFC 1097 Message-ID: <8295@polya.Stanford.EDU> Date: 9 Apr 89 01:43:13 GMT References: <6462@medusa.cs.purdue.edu> Sender: Marc T. Kaufman <kaufman@polya.Stanford.EDU> Reply-To: kaufman@polya.Stanford.EDU (Marc T. Kaufman) Organization: Stanford University Lines: 17