Thread View: comp.protocols.misc
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by Michael P. Capron
Fri, 19 May 1989 00:58
Xmodem problems at high speeds?
Author: Michael P. Capron
Date: Fri, 19 May 1989 00:58
Date: Fri, 19 May 1989 00:58
9 lines
606 bytes
606 bytes
I had heard a rumor that Xmodem breaks down at high baud rates (>2400), something about the checksum algorithm. Does anyone know if there is any truth to this? Thanks in advance, Mike Capron ...uunet!chiron!capron
Re: Xmodem problems at high speeds?
Author: stripes
Date: Sun, 21 May 1989 00:46
Date: Sun, 21 May 1989 00:46
22 lines
1567 bytes
1567 bytes
In article <187@chiron.UUCP> capron@chiron.UUCP (Michael P. Capron) writes:
>
>I had heard a rumor that Xmodem breaks down at high baud rates (>2400),
>something about the checksum algorithm. Does anyone know if there is any truth
>to this?
The checksum does not cause it to breakdown at high speeds, but is not as good
at finding errors as a CRC (a 16-bit CRC is supported by most XMODEM programs).
It is not a good protocall for higher speeds, because the RTD becomes more and
more important (or over LONG distantances, or through packet switched/mutiple
networks, etc.). Ymodem (basicly 1K blocked XMODEM) is better at this, but
still suffers with high RTD (Round Trip Delay). ZMODEM does not suffer from
this (except durring error recovery, I think, and at inital handshakeing time),
it also has a bunch of other goodie, but is a bit harder to implment. Sorces
for a PD implimation of Xmodem, Ymodem, and Zmodem are all available
*somewhere*, mabie SIMTEL20.
--
stripes@wam.umd.edu
Josh_Osborne@Real_World,The
"The dyslexic porgramer"
"Bones, help this man, He's hurt!" <->
<-> "Dammit, Jim, I'm a DOCTOR, not a.... Oh, yeah."
Re: Xmodem problems at high speeds?
Author: Tim Pozar
Date: Sun, 21 May 1989 21:37
Date: Sun, 21 May 1989 21:37
16 lines
1100 bytes
1100 bytes
In article <187@chiron.UUCP> capron@chiron.UUCP (Michael P. Capron) writes:
>I had heard a rumor that Xmodem breaks down at high baud rates (>2400),
>something about the checksum algorithm. Does anyone know if there is any truth
>to this?
>
No truth, but turn-around gets a bit ridiculous at speeds
at or greater than 9600 with current high-speed modems.
Tim
--
...sun!hoptoad!\ Tim Pozar
>fidogate!pozar Fido: 1:125/406
...lll-winken!/ PaBell: (415) 788-3904
USNail: KKSF / 77 Maiden Lane / San Francisco CA 94108
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads