Article View: comp.protocols.ppp
Article #338Re: James - any new thots on pppoE?
From: Thor Lancelot Simon
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 03:41
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 03:41
30 lines
2201 bytes
2201 bytes
In article <3A89E8E8.A629D758@mynetwatchman.com>,
Lawrence Baldwin <baldwinlSPAMMENOT@mynetwatchman.com> wrote:
>Michael wrote:
>>
>> "Josh Howlett" <bujfxh@shark.cse.bris.ac.uk> wrote in message
>> news:G8prup.GCw@bath.ac.uk...
>> | James Carlson <james.d.carlson@sun.com> wrote:
>> | > John D Loop <loop@snt.bst.bls.com> writes:
>
>> |
>> | > Looks can be deceiving. It's trivial to forge packets on PPPoE, and
>> | > use these forged packets to highjack user sessions or snipe them out
>> | > of existence as long as you have bridging at the Ethernet layer.
>
>James,
>
>(Great Book, BTW!)
>
>With a Redback configuration and PPPoE, you've got a private PVC between
>the customer and the Redback...no bridging involved. Thus, I assume
>session hijacking isn't an issue.
Uh, excuse me, but if you have a *private PVC*, what's the point of using
this garbage *at all*?
--
Thor Lancelot Simon tls@rek.tjls.com
And now he couldn't remember when this passion had flown, leaving him so
foolish and bewildered and astray: can any man?
William Styron
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<96cupj$30p$1@panix1.panix.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!144.212.100.101!newsfeed.mathworks.com!panix!news.panix.com!panix1.panix.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<3A87F5AB.7592D38E@snt.bst.bls.com> <G8prup.GCw@bath.ac.uk> <y5ii6.3012$Uc6.66422@news2.atl> <3A89E8E8.A629D758@mynetwatchman.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103eaf,8bcec72c5c695208 X-Google-Attributes: gid103eaf,public X-Google-Thread: 1122a6,8bcec72c5c695208 X-Google-Attributes: gid1122a6,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-13 19:44:04 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!144.212.100.101!newsfeed.mathworks.com!panix!news.panix.com!panix1.panix.com!not-for-mail From: tls@panix.com (Thor Lancelot Simon) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.ppp,bellsouth.net.support.adsl Subject: Re: James - any new thots on pppoE? Date: 13 Feb 2001 22:41:39 -0500 Organization: PANIX -- Public Access Networks Corp. Lines: 30 Message-ID: <96cupj$30p$1@panix1.panix.com> References: <3A87F5AB.7592D38E@snt.bst.bls.com> <G8prup.GCw@bath.ac.uk> <y5ii6.3012$Uc6.66422@news2.atl> <3A89E8E8.A629D758@mynetwatchman.com> Reply-To: tls@rek.tjls.com NNTP-Posting-Host: panix1.panix.com X-Trace: news.panix.com 982122100 2578 166.84.0.226 (14 Feb 2001 03:41:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Feb 2001 03:41:40 GMT