Article View: comp.protocols.ppp
Article #84Why is PPP better than SLIP
From: Pankaj Tyagi
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 16:13
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 16:13
53 lines
3038 bytes
3038 bytes
Hi, This may be a FAQ question but I have been unable to find the answer to this question for a long time. WHY IS PPP BETTER THAN SLIP? To make this question less general I'll give a scenario that I'm currently invloved in. o I'm developing an application in which a 486 based workstation connects to a central database (after dialing up to a terminal server). A lot of data is interchanged between the user at the workstationa and the central database over tcp socket connection. Currently I'm using on the PC side SLIP provided by Chameleon with a 8250 UART talking to a Racal-Milgo Modem V42bis. That modem is capable of giving sustained 14.4kbs and 38.2kbs burst. Using SLIP my throughput (that is counting only usable data, not counting headers and retransmission) is around 8kbs. which I believe is pretty good, given thae fact that the database is not physically located in the same place as the terminal server but is about 250 miles away connected to the terminal server through a router and leased line. o Given this how much can PPP improve performance or what value can it add to the whole process. o As a side note, I have before me a recent article in CW titled "Remote user get TCP/IP sans LAN" which goes on to describe this prduct called "SupperPPP" whic is "...layered over the Microsoft Corp. Windows operating environment and Frontier's TCP/IP or any industry-standard Open System Interconnect communications protocols." This product, it seems provides TCP/IP functionality over serial lines and it "adds error correction, retransmission and speed to the older SLIP for remote TCP/IP networking.....speedwise PPP could translate into a tenfold improvement over SLIP" NOW is that really true. I mean I thought I was getting almost all I could bet from my POTS line using SLIP. Can it really be true that PPP is really that much superior to SLIP? Any help is appreciated. Pankaj Tyagi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #include std.disclaimer| pankaj@bass.bu.edu,pankaj@pub2.bu.edu #if IDONTLIKEYUORQUOTE |"..I mean if I said that I'm the king just because some #include local.joke | watery tart lobbed me a scimitar, they'd put me away" -- #include std.disclaimer| pankaj@bass.bu.edu,pankaj@pub2.bu.edu #if IDONTLIKEYUORQUOTE |"..I mean if I said that I'm the king just because some #include local.joke | watery tart lobbed me a scimitar, they'd put me away" ----------------------- Quote from Monty Pythons "Quest of the Holy Grail------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<94745@bu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!bu.edu!bass.bu.edu!pankajShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!bu.edu!bass.bu.edu!pankaj From: pankaj@bass.bu.edu (Pankaj Tyagi) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.ppp Subject: Why is PPP better than SLIP Summary: Request for Comparision of SlIP and PPP based solutions. Message-ID: <94745@bu.edu> Date: 27 Aug 92 16:13:52 GMT Sender: news@bu.edu Reply-To: pankaj@bass.bu.edu (Pankaj Tyagi) Followup-To: comp.protocols.ppp Distribution: usa Organization: Boston University Lines: 53