🚀 go-pugleaf

Yes they are the same.  My goal is to make my computer act the same under
WinNT and Linux/Samba as far as file/print/NAT goes.  I did get file/print
working under NT.  I was in Linux and used smbclient to access the same
NT server/share name.

When my regular computer is running NT, the share is visible to 9$.  When
that same computer runs Linux/Samba, it is not visible.  Yet I can access
that share from my NT box at work.

Joe Tseng
joe_tseng@hotmail.com


On 13 Oct 1998, Hap C wrote:

> did you look in smb.conf and make sure that the share name and server
> (i.e., domain) name are what you're entering when trying to access the
> share?
> 
> H
> 
> Meryl <joe_tseng@hotmail.com> wrote in article
> > 1. I am currently attempting to get my Win9$ notebook to see the file
> > shares on my Linux box.  I have not had any success at all.  I know I am
> > close because:
> > 
> >   - I can access Win9$ using smbclient
> >   - I can access SMB itself using smbclient
> >   - I can have each of the machines ping each other and ifconfig does
> > show eth0
> >   - I can attach an SMB file share from home to my NTW4 at work
> >   - I can telnet to Linux and carry out HTTP operations
> >   - I can map a drive in Win9$ when the other computer is running NTS4
> > 
> > Yet when I try to map a drive in Win9$ using both machine name and IP
> > address it gives me:
> > 
> >   Error 53: the computer name specified in the network path cannot be
> > located.
> >   Make sure you are specifying the computer name correctly, or try again
> > later
> >   when the remote computer is available.
> > 
> > So what is the deal???
> >