Standard MIB object ?

Article View: comp.protocols.snmp

Article #222

Back to comp.protocols.snmp Previous Next

#222

From: Rick Frink
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 02:57

9 lines
838 bytes

   Why isn't the object 'collisions' part of either MIB I/II ?  It seems
   very basic, yet essential.  ( If collisions is not relevant, then either
   populate with something similar or nothing ).

-- 
Rick Frink                                              (513) 865-1645
Mead Data Central                             Telecomm/Campus Networks
P.O. Box 933                                       rfrink@meaddata.com
Dayton, Ohio  45401                          ...!uunet!meaddata!rfrink

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1goqabINN84h@meaddata.meaddata.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!meaddata!rfrink

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!meaddata!rfrink
From: rfrink@meaddata.com (Rick Frink)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.snmp
Subject: Standard MIB object ?
Date: 17 Dec 1992 02:57:15 GMT
Organization: Mead Data Central, Dayton OH
Lines: 10
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <1goqabINN84h@meaddata.meaddata.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: campnet.meaddata.com