Article View: comp.protocols.snmp
Article #54Re: MIBs for SS7
From: David Richard
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 17:55
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 17:55
58 lines
2921 bytes
2921 bytes
In article 3145@ra.nrl.navy.mil, atkinson@itd.nrl.navy.mil (Randall Atkinson) writes:
>
>In article <2115@devnull.mpd.tandem.com>,
> nath@mpd.tandem.com (Narendra M. Nath (Pi-Net)) writes:
>>>
>>> Does anyone out there know about any existing MIB for SS7.
>>> If so please send me a copy
>
>In article <1992Jul26.233303.1@research.ptt.nl>,
> <mschenk@research.ptt.nl> Mike Schenk writes:
>
>% You mean managing SS7 with SNMP? That does not seem very appropriate
>% and I have not heard about anyone doing it. However, managing SS7 with
>% CMIS/CMIP is something completely different.
>
> Why the hell not use SNMP ? It is more secure than CMIP and it
>WORKS properly and interoperably and it is deployed in 100 times more
>sites than CMIP/CMOT is. The only thing "completely different" is
>that using CMIP make NO SENSE technically, while using SNMP makes a
>hell of a lot of sense.
Just for the record, I think this is the first time I've seen a
religious war on the net specific to CMISE vs SNMP. I'm surprise this
hasn't happened sooner, but then I don't follow this group much and I
might of missed previous ones.
> No doubt this is why BELLCORE has published a number of MIBs for use
>with SNMP. SS7 might be among them. I know that SONET and DS1/DS3
>are among the published MIBs.
I thought Bellcore's direction for operational interfaces to network
elements was to use CMISE. So says TR-828. This has certainly been
their stance in T1M1. And they certainly have a large number of
specified MIBs for use with CMISE.
So it seems I'm equally uninformed as Mike. Would you please provide
us with references of the Bellcore documents to which you refer?
>[Rude comments about Europeans ISO zealots
>not having a clue about what tools work have been deleted here]
Does navy.mil have an axe to grind with GOSIP too? :-)
>% Currently MIBs are in development. Managed objects have been
>% defined for MTP and ISUP. Managed objects for other protocol
>% parts (SCCP, TC etc) are currently being developed.
Just out of curiosity Mike, what committees are defining this? Or is
this home grown?
Thanks,
David Richard
Ericsson Network Systems, MS L03 | Phone: 214-997-0923
P.O. Box 833875 | Internet: exudjr@exu.ericsson.se
Richardson, TX 75083-3875 | "And everybody knows that the dice are loaded"
- Leonard Cohen
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jul30.175554.5915@exu.ericsson.se>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!ericom!exucom.exu.ericsson.se!newsReferences:
<3145@ra.nrl.navy.mil>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.snmp Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!ericom!exucom.exu.ericsson.se!news From: exudjr@exu.ericsson.se (David Richard) Subject: Re: MIBs for SS7 Message-ID: <1992Jul30.175554.5915@exu.ericsson.se> Sender: news@exu.ericsson.se Nntp-Posting-Host: s10b21.exu.ericsson.se Reply-To: exudjr@exu.ericsson.se Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc. References: <3145@ra.nrl.navy.mil> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 17:55:54 GMT Lines: 59