Article View: comp.protocols.snmp
Article #73Re: Trakker by Concord Communications
From: Tom Fitzgerald
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 04:37
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 04:37
27 lines
1636 bytes
1636 bytes
rtodt@relay.nswc.navy.mil (Rodney Todt - E41) writes: > Can anyone advise me about the subject product. The Trakker looks pretty interesting. We've been shopping around for something similar, and will try to get one in for evaluation. In its favor, it can follow multi-packet transactions, so it can tell that an NFS request, or an ARP, has gone out with no response being returned. The hardware seems powerful enough to follow a heavily loaded net, and the user interface is slick (though potentially slow). It also does the standard things: duplicate IP address detection, alarms on traffic levels or particular packet types (redirects, quench etc), traffic breakdown by address, protocol, etc. As negative points, it's expensive, and it doesn't understand any protocols except TCP/IP and DECNET. Concord plans to add Netware support "soon" and Vines support eventually (and some others that I can't remember), but that's it for now. > In general, it is suppose to be a supplement to SNMP. This is kinda misleading - it's built on top of SNMP, as are all good network-monitoring packages these days. --- Tom Fitzgerald Wang Labs fitz@wang.com 1-508-967-5278 Lowell MA, USA ...!uunet!wang!fitz
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<bmsa6l.ccd@wang.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!bu.edu!wang!fitzReferences:
<1992Apr8.193724.21147@relay.nswc.navy.mil>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!bu.edu!wang!fitz From: fitz@wang.com (Tom Fitzgerald) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.snmp Subject: Re: Trakker by Concord Communications Message-ID: <bmsa6l.ccd@wang.com> Date: 16 Apr 92 04:37:32 GMT References: <1992Apr8.193724.21147@relay.nswc.navy.mil> Sender: news@wang.com Organization: Wang Labs, Lowell MA, USA Lines: 27