Article View: comp.protocols.snmp
Article #96Getting CMU snmp implementation to compile RFC's correctly
From: Dan Lambright
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 1992 20:57
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 1992 20:57
20 lines
1306 bytes
1306 bytes
I have been able to get RFC 1158 to work correctly with the CMU snmp implementation, except for OIDs that need "parameters" (probably not the right term) By that I mean, say for the AT table, the parameter would be the ip address of the address resolution table entry you want. Those OIDs that need parameters do not work with our CMU snmpget/snmptest. Examining the RFC itself, I cannot find any description of the need for the parameter. That is, examining the (SMI) entry of the AT table OIDs in RFC 1158, one does not find a formal definition of the need of a parameter. The need for the parameter is defined in a different RFC (1098, which, of course, CMU never sees.) So how does CMU know that an atTable mib needs a parameter? When I try to give it one, it gives a seg fault (in proc parse_subtree()) . Does anyone out there know of a way to solve this problem? Dan Lambright dan@gordian.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep6.205752.23663@gordian.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!news.claremont.edu!ucivax!news.service.uci.edu!gordius!danShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.snmp Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!news.claremont.edu!ucivax!news.service.uci.edu!gordius!dan From: dan@gordian.com (Dan Lambright) Subject: Getting CMU snmp implementation to compile RFC's correctly Message-ID: <1992Sep6.205752.23663@gordian.com> Organization: Gordian; Costa Mesa, CA Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1992 20:57:52 GMT Lines: 21