Thread View: comp.protocols.snmp
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by Jon Crowcroft
Tue, 11 Aug 1992 07:58
stop me if you've heard this one, but...
Author: Jon Crowcroft
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1992 07:58
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1992 07:58
23 lines
747 bytes
747 bytes
Evolution dictates: SGMP (simple gateway management protocol) SNMP (simple network management protocol) SMP (simple management protocol) SP (simple protocol) P (protocol) but then what? :-) jon p.s. of course, we should expect divergent species, such as MP (managment protocol) and M (management) but since these are neither simple, nor necessarily protocols, they serve no useful function. ------- End of Forwarded Message
Re: stop me if you've heard this one, but...
Author: John Stewart
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 16:09
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 16:09
20 lines
942 bytes
942 bytes
In article <2841@ucl-cs.uucp> J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk (Jon Crowcroft) writes: >Evolution dictates: >SGMP (simple gateway management protocol) >SNMP (simple network management protocol) >SMP (simple management protocol) >SP (simple protocol) >P (protocol) > >but then what? Obviously, "Segmentation Violation (core dump)". Get it? *(SGMP) = "Simple Gateway Management Protocol" ... *(P) = "Protocol" *(NULL) = Seg Fault Let's hope the analogy isn't too good. /jws
Re: stop me if you've heard this one, but...
Author: John Chambers
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 16:02
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 16:02
36 lines
2247 bytes
2247 bytes
In article <1992Aug12.160937.16515@udel.edu>, stewart@ra.cis.udel.edu (John Stewart) writes: > In article <2841@ucl-cs.uucp> J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk (Jon Crowcroft) writes: > >Evolution dictates: > >SGMP (simple gateway management protocol) > >SNMP (simple network management protocol) > >SMP (simple management protocol) > >SP (simple protocol) > >P (protocol) > > > >but then what? > > Obviously, "Segmentation Violation (core dump)". Get it? Actually, at that point we will see the long-awaited arrival of a real network operating system (NOS), so no such protocol will be needed, just a network interface that can deliver the NOS's (binary for efficiency) packets. Network management will then be synonymous with system management, and we will have the joys of dealing with the new world-wide management structure that will develop to deal with it. Actually, I'm quite well aware that such things have existed for at least a decade now. By "arrival" I mean that we will finally have the sense to do it right and start using some NOS, rather than continuing to futz around with klutsy partial solutions like NFS and SNMP. (So please don't send me any flames telling me what an idiot I am for not knowing that it's already been done. ;-) But my real reason for posting this is that I've been reading about SMP, but so far I haven't managed to actually get a copy of any specs (or RFC or whatever the doc is called). Lots of advertising hype, but where's the beef? Everyone thinks that specs are obviously available from somewhere, but so far no clues sufficient to actually get anything. How might someone without Internet access elicit a copy of such a document? (It'd be interesting to see what the latest partial solution is, especially since people have been asking me if I could implement it, and that's real hard to do without any specs. ;-)
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads