Article View: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.eniac
Article #2Re: Well, now...
From: Math Student from Hell
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 1989 05:43
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 1989 05:43
13 lines
1138 bytes
1138 bytes
In article <DEVEN.89Apr1184706@daniel.pawl.rpi.edu> deven@pawl.rpi.edu (Deven Corzine) writes: >So, it actually got created! Neat. :-) Yeah, but not for long, I bet. The newgroup message was a fun forgery. (I *knew* there was a reason I read 'control'.) In fact, the first rmgroup message has already arrived here. So I'm going to post quick, before it goes away. I voted for c.p.t-i.e back when it was first proposed, and was cheated out of my fair chance to use the group, so it's only fair. When can we expect the alt.webber sub-hierarchy? In some sense, a stochastic process can do better; at least it has a chance. S. M-J. C. Dominus entropy@pawl.rpi.EDU entropy@rpitsmts (BITnet)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1069@rpi.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!batcomputer!rpi!pawl20.pawl.rpi.edu!entropyReferences:
<DEVEN.89Apr1184706@daniel.pawl.rpi.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!batcomputer!rpi!pawl20.pawl.rpi.edu!entropy From: entropy@pawl.rpi.edu (Math Student from Hell) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.eniac Subject: Re: Well, now... Message-ID: <1069@rpi.edu> Date: 2 Apr 89 05:43:13 GMT References: <DEVEN.89Apr1184706@daniel.pawl.rpi.edu> Sender: usenet@rpi.edu Distribution: usa Organization: Eaters of Wisdom Lines: 13