🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Article #10233

(none)

#10233
From: Gene Tsudik
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1988 18:43
14 lines
1047 bytes
I have been experiencing what maybe a bug (or "feature") of 4.3 IP code
when trying to define new IP options. 
The new option that I've defined doesn't seem to bother IP an any higher-level
protocols when the packets are relatively short. But, as soon as fragmentation
is required, e.g. FTP large file, the connection goes dead. My guess is that
the reassembly is never completed at the receiving end. a

My question is: has anyone been playing with option definition in 4.3 IP and, if
so, has a similar problem occurred? Also, is there an obvious place(s) to look
for bugs when defining options? Any common blunders people experience when doing
that ?

Gene Tsudik
USC Network Lab
Technical Details
Message-ID: <8801221843.AA10779@malibu.usc.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!amdcad!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!MALIBU.USC.EDU!tsudik

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!amdcad!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!MALIBU.USC.EDU!tsudik
From: tsudik@MALIBU.USC.EDU (Gene Tsudik)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: (none)
Message-ID: <8801221843.AA10779@malibu.usc.edu>
Date: 22 Jan 88 18:43:09 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 14