🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Article #15436

Shared IP's via HTTP_HOST (new standard?)

#15436
From: kitchin
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 00:00
50 lines
3082 bytes
For virtual domain web hosting my ISP just switched over to shared IP's
via HTTP_HOST (see below if you don't know what this is).   I complained,
since I have only seen this used on very low cost providers, like icom.com and
webcom.com.  But my ISP claims the following:

> In accordance with InterNIC, ARIN, MCI and UUnet policies, we have
> eliminated the use of IP's for virtual web sites permanently.
>
> Browsers supporting only HTTPD v1.0 will indeed see the wrong web
> site, for the reason you cited above.  Updated browsers have been
> available for far more than one year supporting HTTP_HOST.
>
> The use of IP's for virtual web sites is very heavily discouraged
> for many reasons, and would inhibit our growth and our customers in
> far more drastic ways than having to use a current browser.


However it's my understanding that the IP situation is going to be solved by
adding more digits eeeeventuallly.  I have not heard of these "policies" at
ARIN or INTERNIC, although I understand the commercial backbones might
encourage IP sharing, and least for their more economical customers!  I see
from the ARIN template (http://www.arin.net/templates/isptemplate.txt) that
virtual domain IP's are considered "reserved" rather than "assigned," but does
this effect the utilization rate???

Is my ISP feeding me a load of nonsense?


-------
FYI: Shared IP's via HTTP_HOST: See http://www.cyberhost.net, which links to
all the web pages sharing this IP, such as http://www.bcr-net.com.  If you
type http://www.bcr-net.com into a primtive browser, like Netscape 1 or an old
Mosaic, you get the http://www.cyberhost.net page and have to click on the
page you want.  But if you use a modern browser then http://www.bcr-net.com
goes where it should.  (This is icom.com's way of handling old browsers;
webcom.com uses a slightly different scheme.  Both are based on the HTTP_HOST
variable, but webcom uses a HTTP_REFERER trick for all but the most naive
browser.)

Another problem: I suspect many search engine spiders do not set HTTP_HOST.  I
know it used to impossible to submit to Link Exchange a banner sitting on a
shared IP virtual host, but they fixed that.

C.Kitchin
email: kitchin__no@spp*am.comclin.neyt
[The ISP I'm complaining about is in neither of the email addresses here.]

-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/   Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
Technical Details
Message-ID: <6f6aup$i1t$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f9325,d6218de2e9650c0f,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9325,public
X-Google-Thread: fa874,d6218de2e9650c0f,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidfa874,public
From: kitchin@intersurf.com
Subject: Shared IP's via HTTP_HOST (new standard?)
Date: 1998/03/23
Message-ID: <6f6aup$i1t$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
X-Deja-AN: 336884630
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.02 [en] (Win95; I)
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Mar 23 18:53:32 1998 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip,ba.internet