Article View: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Article #7987Re: Moving from coax to 10BaseT
From: Karl Auerbach
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 03:38
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 03:38
45 lines
2713 bytes
2713 bytes
>In a recent column in OST James Gaskin suggests that system administrators >should be converting ethernets from coax to 10BaseT and *not* investing >anything more in coax. I put two questions to the readers of this group: > >1) Do you concur with Mr. Gaskin that coax is dead or dying? > >2) What options are available for small (less than a dozen nodes) networks >currently running coax and wanting to move to 10BaseT? For example, I >understand that 10BaseT topology has all nodes wired to hubs - are there hubs >available which are cost effective for small networks? I lead the Interop "wipe out thinnet" brigade. I strongly agree that thinnet should go the way of punched cards. About the *only* remaining use for thin-net any more is where you have a cluster of machines, say a collection of X terminals, all in one room. When we design and build Interop, that is the only way we will use cheapernet. (We now use fiber-optic Ethernet rather than thick coax for the long runs.) I would never run thin-net through a wall and I would never put it where high reliability is required. Because coax (whether thick or thin) does not limit termination or shorting problems, it tends to break whenever a user gets it into his mind to move something. 10-Base-T, on the other hand, is much more robust. The wire itself is more solid. (And if you use the standard 4-pair stuff, you get two spare pairs, just in case.) If you use level 4 or level 5 wire, you can run it quite a long distance. The RJ45 connectors tend to be pretty solid, much more so than most coax connectors (at least with respect to how they connect to the cable itself.) 10-Base-T hubs also often have very nice properties -- they can block out screeming (jabbering) hosts, block hosts which are sending mal-formed packets, enforce security, etc. They often gather interesting statistics about which hosts are using the net, etc. The 10-Base-T link state light itself is worth many man-hours of saved labor whenever a user calls up and says "my machine isn't talking on the net." On some hubs you can also disable retiming. This can increase your repeater budget, and hence allow end-users to put in their own fan-out boxes. --karl--
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<karl.6.728019489@empirical.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!Dell486.TGV.COM!karlReferences:
<19971@mindlink.bc.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!Dell486.TGV.COM!karl From: karl@empirical.com (Karl Auerbach) Subject: Re: Moving from coax to 10BaseT Message-ID: <karl.6.728019489@empirical.com> Sender: usenet@news.arc.nasa.gov Organization: Empirical Tools and Technologies References: <19971@mindlink.bc.ca> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 03:38:09 GMT Lines: 47