Article View: comp.protocols.time.ntp
Article #687Re: Running NTP at Verdix.Com
From: "Louis A. Mamakos"
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1991 20:32
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1991 20:32
13 lines
1129 bytes
1129 bytes
Sounds reasonable to me. Since UUNET is synchronized to UMD1 directly, you might just want to synchronize with them only and not increase the already heavy load on UMD1 any further. Unless you are going to redistrubute time to a large number of other hosts, you should pick a few normally stratum-2 servers, like UUNET and one or two other stratum-2 machines to peer with. That will reduce the load on the stratum-1 servers which are already over-burdened with too many peers. The sychronization paths are too heavily concentrated at the stratum-1 servers. louie
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9103192032.AA09380@sayshell.umd.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!bionet!agate!ucbvax!SAYSHELL.UMD.EDU!louieReferences:
<9103192021.AA17181@Verdix.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!bionet!agate!ucbvax!SAYSHELL.UMD.EDU!louie
From: louie@SAYSHELL.UMD.EDU ("Louis A. Mamakos")
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.time.ntp
Subject: Re: Running NTP at Verdix.Com
Message-ID: <9103192032.AA09380@sayshell.umd.edu>
Date: 19 Mar 91 20:32:39 GMT
Article-I.D.: sayshell.9103192032.AA09380
References: <9103192021.AA17181@Verdix.COM>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 13