Article View: comp.protocols.time.ntp
Article #795synchronizing a LAN-full of machines
From: Christopher JS Vance
Date: Fri, 17 May 1991 04:21
Date: Fri, 17 May 1991 04:21
20 lines
1480 bytes
1480 bytes
Situation: We have a campus LAN with a Convex, half a dozen Pyramids, two dozen Apollos, three or four dozen Suns, and a gaggle of lesser machines. We run ntp on one of the Suns, have a timed master on the same machine and run timed slaves on the Convex, Pyramids, and Apollos. The timed master is compiled with MNOADJUST defined to stop ntp and timed messing each other up (it was a mess till I found the sources we currently use). Question: Is there some problem with Sun hardware (we have 3's and 4's) which would stop Sun shipping either ntp or timed? Why do all the other machines come with timed? Do Sun not consider synchrony important? Recommendation requested: Should we run a mixed ntp/timed network (as at present)? Should we convert to using ntp throughout? Should we use some other mechanism to keep our machines in synchrony? What overheads are there in running ntp? Timed? Do you have a better suggestion? -- Christopher
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991May17.042109.28962@sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!spool.mu.edu!munnari.oz.au!manuel!ccadfa!sserve!cjsvShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!spool.mu.edu!munnari.oz.au!manuel!ccadfa!sserve!cjsv From: Christopher-Vance@adfa.oz.au (Christopher JS Vance) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.time.ntp Subject: synchronizing a LAN-full of machines Message-ID: <1991May17.042109.28962@sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au> Date: 17 May 91 04:21:09 GMT Sender: cjsv@sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au (Christopher J S Vance) Organization: Computer Science, Univ. of NSW, ADFA Canberra, Australia Lines: 20