Article View: comp.robotics
Article #1340Re: IR remote timing
From: KEN E WILLMOTT
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 17:16
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 17:16
68 lines
2505 bytes
2505 bytes
Hi, Hate me if you like, but I posted erroneous data about infrared remotes, and I thought it would be better to repost, so I fixed the figures and added info about the continuous key mode. I found the postings about the Sony infrared remote control protocol interesting, but I was alarmed to note that it did not seem to mesh with the readings I got from 3 different controls in use in my living room. These are an RCA t.v., an Onkyo receiver, and a Jerrold tuner. Here is what I found (presence of signal = logic 1): First, there is an AGC stabilization pulse, followed by a short break. Then come the mysterious bit patterns (I'll get to them). Signal Duration Polarity ------ -------- ________ AGC pulse 9.15 ms 1 pause 4.33 ms 0 50 3-bit patterns 1125 us (see below) Each 3-bit pattern consists of three 375 us. long bits. The first two are always the same, and convey the binary information. The last is always set to 0. When these bits are laid out end to end, they look like the following (actual data from one of my controllers): 11 01 11 01 10 10 10 11 01 01 10 10 11 10 10 10 10 11 11 01 11 11 01 01 01 There are two interesting features of this stream, neither of which I am sure is always true, or merely an artifact of the particular button I chose. 1) The pattern 00 never appears 2) The pattern 10 never precedes the pattern 01 Note that this can't be what I believe is called Manchester or simple phase encoding, because of the presence of four con- secutive ones. My grouping of bits into pairs is only based on a gut feeling, and may be a red herring. When some keys are held down continously, a different type of packet is sent. It looks like this: Signal Duration Polarity ------ -------- ________ AGC pulse 9.15 ms 1 pause 2.10 ms 0 stop pulse 750 us 1 time until next packet 38.6 ms 0 As I have said before, if anybody out there has more information to add to this, I would be eternally grateful. -Ken
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec22.171631.13996@newshub.ariel.yorku.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!torn!newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!newshub.ariel.yorku.ca!cs911225References:
<1992Dec21.165153.1282@newshub.ariel.yorku.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.robotics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!torn!newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!newshub.ariel.yorku.ca!cs911225 From: cs911225@ariel.yorku.ca (KEN E WILLMOTT) Subject: Re: IR remote timing Message-ID: <1992Dec22.171631.13996@newshub.ariel.yorku.ca> Sender: news@newshub.ariel.yorku.ca (USENET News System) Organization: York University, Toronto, Canada References: <1992Dec21.165153.1282@newshub.ariel.yorku.ca> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 17:16:31 GMT Lines: 69