Article View: comp.robotics
Article #1749Re: How to Explore Mars
From: Jim Mccoy
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 22:24
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 22:24
43 lines
3013 bytes
3013 bytes
In article <HAGERMAN.93Jan7224103@rx7.ece.cmu.edu> hagerman@ece.cmu.edu (John Hagerman) writes: > >There has been some discussion about the tradeoffs between using one >large robot and many small robots for planetary exploration. Has the >Erebus experiment changed the opinion of anyone here? I don't want to >restrict attention to the specific results; for example, I don't think >we learned anything new about fault tolerance. Rather, I'm hoping for >new thoughts engendered by considering the experiment in general. In >my mind, for example, the experiment supports large robots for such >use since a fairly standard large robot design could be fairly easily >modified to conceivably navigate the volcano, and it seems less likely >that the same would hold for small robots. Any other thoughts? Actually, I came up with a completely different opinion based upon the failure in Antarctica. If anything, I believe this adventure has shown the key weakness in the single robot proposals: if something goes wrong you are completely screwed. The scenario in Antarctica was similar to a Mars exploration in that it is remote and a hostile environment, but one big difference is that there will be no one around to crawl to the rim of a canyon to reset the computers or perform other maintenance on Mars. There will be no modification of robot design once the mission to explore Mars begins, you only get to use what you take with you. Please remember that the people paying for the exploration are not going to appreciate it if we end up sending Mars it's biggest paperweight... If anything, the failure of Erebus seems to point to the disadvantages of using a single large robot to explore hostile, unknown environments. With a single robot you have a single point of failure for the entire mission, if your robot ends up with machanical difficulties or other problems you have just wasted millions. With multiple smaller robots you still have other robots to continue exploration and you have the option of making the smaller robots capable of some specialization to explore unique environments. The Erebus experiment seemed to provide nothing to support the single robot proposals, I am really curious as to how anyone could find support for them under the circumstances of this situation... jim -- Jim McCoy | PGP 2.0 Key md5 hash: j-mccoy@nwu.edu | 61323c49024cb089337c78a05aafe8c6 mccoy@ils.nwu.edu | finger mccoy@ils.nwu.edu for public key
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan8.222437.10042@ils.nwu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!news.acns.nwu.edu!news.ils.nwu.edu!mccoyReferences:
<HAGERMAN.93Jan7224103@rx7.ece.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.robotics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!news.acns.nwu.edu!news.ils.nwu.edu!mccoy From: mccoy@ils.nwu.edu (Jim Mccoy) Subject: Re: How to Explore Mars Message-ID: <1993Jan8.222437.10042@ils.nwu.edu> Sender: usenet@ils.nwu.edu (Mr. usenet) Nntp-Posting-Host: aristotle.ils.nwu.edu Organization: The Institute for the Learning Sciences References: <HAGERMAN.93Jan7224103@rx7.ece.cmu.edu> Distribution: comp Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 22:24:37 GMT Lines: 44