Article View: comp.robotics
Article #224Re: Dead reckoning
From: Rick Smith
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 14:24
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 14:24
26 lines
1571 bytes
1571 bytes
hollombe@polymath.tti.com (The Polymath) writes:
> The term usually refers to navigation by reference to known
>landmarks, ...
Well, yes, you start from a known landmark, but the "ded" for "deduced"
refers to the fact that when you need to know your location you don't
have any landmarks available. You *start* from a known landmark but
then you deduce your position based on direction and amount of motion.
My original statement was that you can't just rely on ded reckoning
("dead" reckoning). You need some kind of position sensor to close
the position control loop or the errors will accumulate.
I interpreted the original question as a search for low cost position
sensing, and I don't think that ded reconing is good enough for "low
cost" position sensing except on toys. If you have to go to esoteric
drive systems or inertial nav, then I don't see ded reconing as a low
cost alternative to sensing external features.
You can't really ever get away from "some" ded reconing; that's
essentially what a moving device is doing as it moves between
position/feature sensor readings.
Rick.
smith@sctc.com arden hills, minnesota
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr10.142455.366@sctc.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!pacbell.com!att!news.cs.indiana.edu!umn.edu!sctc.com!smithReferences:
<NIVEK.92Apr9170542@scythe.frc.ri.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.robotics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!pacbell.com!att!news.cs.indiana.edu!umn.edu!sctc.com!smith From: smith@sctc.com (Rick Smith) Subject: Re: Dead reckoning Message-ID: <1992Apr10.142455.366@sctc.com> Organization: SCTC References: <NIVEK.92Apr9170542@scythe.frc.ri.cmu.edu> Distribution: comp.robotics Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 14:24:55 GMT Lines: 28