Article View: comp.robotics
Article #226Re: Dead reckoning
From: Erann Gat
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 16:41
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 16:41
12 lines
1013 bytes
1013 bytes
In article <GERRY.92Apr10110253@onion.cmu.edu> gerry@cmu.edu (Gerry Roston) writes: > I suspect that when >we repeat these tests as the Ambler walks around outdors, that the >error will be less. [Why? Because I suspect that the error in my >ground truth measurements were high due to the confined conditions of >the building in which the earlier tests were done.] Why whould confined conditions increase ded reckoning errors? Is the robot bumping into the walls? Erann Gat gat@robotics.jpl.nasa.gov
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr10.164126.25875@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!forsight!gatReferences:
<NIVEK.92Apr9170542@scythe.frc.ri.cmu.edu> <GERRY.92Apr10110253@onion.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.robotics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!forsight!gat From: gat@forsight.jpl.nasa.gov (Erann Gat) Subject: Re: Dead reckoning Message-ID: <1992Apr10.164126.25875@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> Sender: news@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov (Usenet) Nntp-Posting-Host: robotics.jpl.nasa.gov Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory References: <NIVEK.92Apr9170542@scythe.frc.ri.cmu.edu> <GERRY.92Apr10110253@onion.cmu.edu> Distribution: comp.robotics Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 16:41:26 GMT