Article View: comp.robotics
Article #78Re: Miniboard or Motorola eval board?
From: P. Douglas Reeder
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1992 13:34
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1992 13:34
26 lines
1513 bytes
1513 bytes
In article <1992Nov3.135508.2766@news.media.mit.edu> fredm@media.mit.edu (Fred G Martin) writes: :Reasons you would not choose the Mini Board: : :* There is no prototyping area on the MB. I believe the EVB has some There are no protoyping areas on the EVB. (Unless they've changed the design since I got mine.) Note that the EVB is intended to simulate an HC11 with replaceable ROM, to help one design HC11-using devices. It thus is not really designed to be used in a non-prototype system. Functionally, the HC11 is always in single-chip operating mode, so hardware not part of the EVB cannot be in the memory map. This means you are forever limited to the two 8K blocks of RAM (though you could replace the 8K ROM with one of your own). A furthur point is that the EVB monitor takes up 182 bytes of the zero-page RAM. -- Doug Reeder USENET: ...!tektronix!reed!reeder Internet: reeder@reed.EDU BITNET: reeder@reed.BITNET I am actively seeking scientific programming contracts.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov4.133417.8689@reed.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!wupost!emory!ogicse!reed!reederReferences:
<CSTROCKB.92Nov2194659@csws6.cs.sunysb.edu> <1992Nov3.135508.2766@news.media.mit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!wupost!emory!ogicse!reed!reeder From: reeder@reed.edu (P. Douglas Reeder) Newsgroups: comp.robotics Subject: Re: Miniboard or Motorola eval board? Message-ID: <1992Nov4.133417.8689@reed.edu> Date: 4 Nov 92 13:34:17 GMT Article-I.D.: reed.1992Nov4.133417.8689 References: <CSTROCKB.92Nov2194659@csws6.cs.sunysb.edu> <1992Nov3.135508.2766@news.media.mit.edu> Organization: Div, Grad & Curl Lines: 26